Unwalkable disease wiki5/27/2023 ![]() ![]() We’re going to fix the street and the curb and the sidewalk. We are going to fix all of the infrastructure directly in front of your home. I come to you on behalf of the city with a proposal. Here’s how we should be thinking about this.Ĭonsider the following: You own a $200,000 house. If density matters for anything, it is a byproduct of success, not its cause. How valuable are the units? How well is the street maintained? What is the inflation rate for construction costs? What is the city’s bond rating? Will the association properly maintain the roof of the building? What will happen to the building across the street currently in probate? Does the city’s code empower NIMBY’s? Productive places are the solution.Īnyone who remotely comprehends the number of variables at play here would never ask such a ridiculous question. Density is not our problem or our solution. I hate density as a metric and whenever I hear someone talk about it my mind reflexively moves on to something more worthy of my time. Let me restate the question: Something that I think would be valuable for planners and everyone else who finds it painful to think independently but instead to take comfort in misapplying “data” provided by others deemed experts (see parking codes as one of many examples) is to have a table of densities that will allow us to zone a Strong Town. What is the right kind of infrastructure for a town of 5000 with 800 people/sq mi, versus a town of 15000 with 2000 people/sq mi? Something that I think would be valuable for planners and everyone else, is to have a reference for how to build financially solvent towns at varying levels of density/size. Just before I went on vacation, Jim Kumon sent me another one (he gets a lot of these emails first now) and suggested, based on the number of times it has been asked, that I give it another go. Either way, in the extreme triage that is my inbox, these emails rank pretty low. In the end, Gout and Franklin agree that physicians, or "quacks," are not the answer and Franklin promises to "take exercise daily, and live temperately." Gout tells Franklin it's only a matter of time before he picks up his "old habits," cautioning Franklin about a return visit "at a proper time and place.The most common question I receive by email is some variation of: what is the right density for a Strong Town? What is the magic number that makes all the math work and that we should plug into our zoning codes to get the optimum place? The act of asking such a question indicates to me that the sender (a) has not read much from our website or (b) has read from our website but not spent much time thinking about it. bent and perhaps crippled by weight of years, and too long and too great labor." without any kind of bodily exercise."įranklin tries to defend his use of a carriage, but Gout responds that he should burn it or offer it to "the poor peasants, who work in the vineyards and grounds about the villages. Gout chides Franklin for his sedentary lifestyle, asking him why he eats "an inordinate breakfast, four dishes of tea, with cream, and one or two buttered toasts, with slices of hung beef" only to "sit down to write at your desk, or converse with persons who apply to you on business. Gout responds that it was the result of excessive eating, drinking, and other indulgences. In Dialogue Between Franklin and the Gout, written in 1780, Franklin asks Gout what he did to deserve the aches and pains brought on by the disease. Franklin and Pitt were said to have discussed gout, but it's Franklin's conversation with gout, itself, that gives us insight into the nature of his affliction. ![]() William Pitt, for example, also struggled with the disease. Henry's health problems may have been further exacerbated by syphilis, but this diagnosis is unsubstantiated.īenjamin Franklin had a terrible case of gout, but he wasn't the only American colonial to suffer from the affliction during the 18th century. it was high time for us to get clear of him, in order to avoid offending him or irritating him further, having regard to his malady." In 1541, the French ambassador wrote, "The King's life was really thought in danger, not from fever, but from the leg which often troubles him." Henry's own doctors commented, "By reason of his sore leg, the anguish whereof began more and more to increase, he waxed sickly, and therewithal forward and difficult to be pleased. The painful swelling caused by the so-called "disease of kings" could be acute or chronic, and the king definitely suffered from leg ulcers, mood swings, and constant pain. Henry VIII gained more weight as he aged, which could have increased his risk. Historians believe Henry VIII had gout, in large part because many aspects of his lifestyle - including excessive meat and alcohol consumption - are associated with the illness. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |